I am a human player and have been using Virion for months. I wouldn't mind a nerf that causes attackers to take some losses again when attacking garrisons (I'm assuming the nerf was mainly directed at his ultimate).

I usually counter this move by using gazul and removing all the bodies with resurrect.

Ressurect was not the problem. I am surprised they realized that.

tonzkie04 wrote:

official aoc discord

virion nerf.JPG

That's rubbish, the reason why virion nerf was postponed because it wasn't enough and it didn't make a difference.

Well, i don't know how .. But they need to balance the game somehow.

Humans atking stronger strongholds and barelly getting losses is insane.

Dropping rez from 40 maxed to 15. But fortunately cancelled.

As if having 91% injury rate was not enough now they don't get injured at all. Might as well just cancel every other race, it seems they forget this game has other three races. Human players are already probably 70%, if they keep on going down this road soon it will be 90 and then 100.

Lol actually dwarf make up 50 - 60% on a lot of servers now humans are more around 30% and btw dwarf can also siege with 0% casualties against top lvl garrisons just not dwarf garrisons and are considerably stronger in pvp then humans.

Zer0C001 wrote:

...dwarf ... are considerably stronger in pvp then humans.

I disagree with this. Everything else being equal, at most, dwarves are slightly stronger in PvP than humans. But that isn't even what's relevant. Everything else is not equal. PvP is almost always decided by heroes (specifically their stats) and borrowed gold troops. Now, taking that into account, ask yourself, is it smart to play dwarf, given they have to use a troop with 100 percent death rate in the event of a loss, even when fighting within their own kingdom? The disparity in risk is comical. Also, if you think their sieging advantage compensates them for this, take a look at the recent honor events on mature and/or merged servers. 90-95 percent of the top performers were human lol.

Not concerned with early-mid game in which dwarves are still very relevant. 99% of dwarf players on my merged server are using a human front line. Swords. If the fact that the only used frontline is swords and it takes if not 0 close to 0 casualties against a top tier tower I don't know what else could call for a nerf. The only reason people use dwarf at all is because of bombardiers. Considering that archers are not far behind though and humans have a much more balanced unit choice I don't see how any other race even comes close to comparing to human.

As it is the scales are heavily tipped towards humans but if that means that they can not be nerfed because the majority of the population will whine about it then they might as well remove the other races because they are not even close to being competent enough to start buffing units from the other three races appropriately.